The fact that you say cryptos could disappear but ICON would remain by itself and still flourish because it can “function,” points towards your delusions about a company that is 95% promises at this point.
You also always talk about how ICX is world changing, and it will basically be blockchain etc. Yet, you now say that three companies would = a working product and that is great. So which is it? ICX is world changing and basically will be blockchain in the future? Or ICX will have a working product within S Korea for a few companies in 3-5 years or whatever the timeline is.
My point about the token was also because you said the tokens are not important at one point, and that just the network is.
You also mention you’re here to talk about ICON, like ICON is the only important facet in terms of not only the future value of it’s own price, but all of crypto. Again, it’s somewhat akin to delusions of grandeur in terms of how you view ICON to think it’s value won’t be influenced by the rest of the cryptosphere, especially when at this point its pretty much just promises.
You’re right, there is no point in going on with this because it is going in circles and we clearly have different POVs.